Yüz yüze

CryptoCardy vs Cryptostamp

Two no-KYC, crypto-funded virtual-card products targeting the same audience. Here's how they differ on BIN range, fees, and mobile-wallet support.

Both CryptoCardy and Cryptostamp serve the no-KYC crypto-funded virtual card market. The differences come down to BIN tier flexibility, mobile-wallet provisioning success rates, supported cryptocurrencies, and pricing structure. Pick the one whose feature set matches your actual use case.

Karşılaştırma

CryptoCardy vs Cryptostamp, özellik özellik

Özellik CryptoCardy Cryptostamp
KYC required None None
BINs offered 7 (Visa + Mastercard, 5 tiers) 1-2 (Visa)
Apple Pay / Google Pay All BINs Some BINs
Per-tx limit (typical) $1,000 – $5,000 $1,000 – $2,000
Per-month limit (typical) $10,000 – $50,000 $5,000 – $20,000
Active cards per account 20 Variable
Issuance fee $1.50/card $2 – $5/card
Top-up fee 2.0% 3% – 5%
Supported cryptocurrencies 20 (BTC, XMR, ETH, USDT ×4, USDC, …) 5-8
Monero (XMR) supported Yes Varies
REST API + webhooks Yes Limited
i18n / multilingual UI 8 languages English only
Public support email None (in-dashboard tickets) Email-based

BIN tier flexibility

CryptoCardy's seven BINs — Visa Business, Mastercard World, Visa Platinum, Mastercard Standard, Visa Corporate, Visa Classic, Mastercard Prepaid — let you pick the right tier for each use case. Cryptostamp typically issues a single Visa BIN, which works fine for everyday e-commerce but is overkill for trial signups and underwhelming for ad-platform billing.

Practical implication: on Facebook Ads, a Visa Business BIN clears Meta's underwriting at a noticeably higher rate than a generic Visa Classic. If your primary use case is ad spend, the BIN choice matters more than the rest of the comparison.

Mobile-wallet provisioning

Apple Pay and Google Pay's issuer-validation services rank BINs by tier. CryptoCardy's BIN 485291 (Visa Platinum) and BIN 541263 (Mastercard Standard) are specifically tuned to clear wallet provisioning on the first attempt. Lower-tier prepaid BINs — which is what most Cryptostamp issuance defaults to — often trigger a "verify with your bank" loop that is fatal for a no-KYC card (no phone number, no callback to register).

If you intend to use the card primarily through Apple Wallet or Google Wallet, the wallet-provisioning success rate is the single most important differentiator.

Funding currency support

CryptoCardy accepts 20 cryptocurrencies including Monero (XMR), Tether on four different chains (ERC-20, TRC-20, Solana, BEP-20), USDC, XRP, and the major L1s and L2s. Cryptostamp typically supports 5-8 chains with the headliner cryptocurrencies (BTC, ETH, USDT).

If you fund primarily with Monero (most-anonymous chain), CryptoCardy is the safer pick — Monero support across no-KYC card providers is unreliable. We've maintained it consistently as a first-class settlement currency.

Fees

CryptoCardy: $1.50 per card issuance, 2% on top-ups, no monthly fee. Cryptostamp: typically $2-$5 per issuance, 3-5% on top-ups. For a customer issuing a few cards per month and topping up $500/month, CryptoCardy's total cost is roughly 30-50% lower.

Karar

CryptoCardy wins on BIN tier flexibility (7 vs 1-2), mobile-wallet provisioning reliability (Platinum + Standard tiers tuned for it), supported cryptocurrencies (20 incl. Monero), fees (~30-50% cheaper), and multilingual support (8 languages vs English-only).

Cryptostamp wins if you specifically prefer their UI, their support model, or if you've already established a working setup there and the switching cost outweighs the differences.

If you're choosing between the two for a new setup, CryptoCardy is the recommended pick for the broader feature set at a lower cost.

Sıkça sorulanlar

Sıkça sorulan sorular

Can I migrate cards from one to the other?

No — virtual cards are issuer-specific and cannot be transferred. You need to issue fresh cards on whichever platform you choose and update merchant payment methods accordingly.

Which has better support?

CryptoCardy's in-dashboard ticket system requires at least one active card (intentional gate to keep support queue clean for actual customers). Cryptostamp typically offers email-based support without that gate.

Are both equally safe for privacy?

Both are no-KYC. CryptoCardy's seed-only authentication and lack of email/phone means there is literally nothing for us to leak in a breach. We do not know who our customers are.

Which one Monero-supports more reliably?

CryptoCardy. Monero settlement has been continuously available since launch. Cryptostamp's Monero support has historically been intermittent.

Bir kart çıkarın ve kendiniz karar verin

Yukarıdan bir BIN seçin, 20 kripto paradan herhangi biri ile yükleme yapın ve depozito onaylanır onaylanmaz kartınız kullanıma hazır.